Games Above .500
Chance Will Make Playoffs
| 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||||||||||||||||
| Chance will make playoffs | Chance will finish regular season at seed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| G | W | - | L | - | T | PCT | GD | % | Change | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Avg. | Change | RPI | Strength | |||
| Lippincott | 2 | - | 0 | - | 0 | 1.000 | 54.9 | 81.2 | % | +16.9 | 40 | 20 | 13 | 9 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2.7 | +1.13 | 1 | .606 | Show me your TD's | |
| Metheny | 1 | - | 1 | - | 0 | .500 | 81.4 | 66.4 | +0.3 | 20 | 20 | 15 | 12 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 3.8 | -0.01 | 9 | .616 | Holy Gronkamole | ||
| Smith | 1 | - | 1 | - | 0 | .500 | -2.7 | 36.1 | +17.5 | 5 | 9 | 11 | 11 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 10 | 7 | 5.7 | +1.32 | 7 | .488 | The Force Interpolates | ||
| Salsberry | 1 | - | 1 | - | 0 | .500 | 6.5 | 35.7 | +18.6 | 6 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 6 | 5.6 | +1.46 | 8 | .520 | Team salsberry | ||
| Flores | 1 | - | 1 | - | 0 | .500 | -2.6 | 33.6 | -29.2 | 5 | 8 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 8 | 5.8 | -1.86 | 4 | .491 | Team Flores | ||
PPR
Big Games
Who should we root for? Explain
| Week of 9/15 | ||||
| Metheny 79.4 Smith 94.8 | ||||
| Thu | 100.0* | Chance in playoffs | 100.0* | Average seed |
| Lippincott | +0.3 | |||
| Metheny | -13.1 | -0.8 | ||
| Smith | +10.5 | +0.8 | ||
| Salsberry | +0.4 | |||
| Flores | +0.4 | |||
| Purvis 146.9 Flores 126.2 | ||||
| Thu | 100.0* | Chance in playoffs | 100.0* | Average seed |
| Lippincott | +0.4 | |||
| Metheny | +0.3 | |||
| Smith | +0.3 | |||
| Salsberry | +0.4 | |||
| Flores | -13.5 | -0.8 | ||
| Lippincott 116.9 M Crouch 106.8 | ||||
| Thu | 100.0* | Chance in playoffs | 100.0* | Average seed |
| Lippincott | +11.0 | +0.7 | ||
| Metheny | +0.1 | |||
| Flores | +0.1 | |||
| McNichols 126.5 Salsberry 158.8 | ||||
| Thu | 100.0* | Chance in playoffs | 100.0* | Average seed |
| Lippincott | -0.1 | |||
| Metheny | -0.1 | |||
| Salsberry | +7.3 | +0.7 | ||
| Flores | *+0.1 | |||
| Lassiter 126.1 S Crouch 115.9 | ||||
| Thu | 100.0* | Chance in playoffs | 100.0* | Average seed |
| Lippincott | +0.2 | |||
| Metheny | +0.3 | |||
| Smith | +0.3 | |||
| Salsberry | +0.2 | |||
| Flores | +0.3 | |||
| Week of 9/22 | ||||
| Smith vs SalsberryIf winner is:HomeTieAway | ||||
| Thu | 100.0* | Chance in playoffs | 100.0* | Average seed |
| Metheny | *66.467.066.4 | |||
| Smith | 49.134.124.8 | 4.85.86.4 | ||
| Salsberry | 23.232.347.0 | 6.55.94.9 | ||
| Flores | 33.434.4*33.6 | |||
| Flores vs LippincottHomeTieAway | ||||
| Thu | 100.0* | Chance in playoffs | 100.0* | Average seed |
| Lippincott | 70.677.788.2 | 3.43.02.3 | ||
| Metheny | 65.966.766.7 | |||
| Smith | 35.536.736.4 | |||
| Salsberry | 35.236.335.9 | |||
| Flores | 47.933.124.6 | 4.95.86.4 | ||
| Purvis vs MethenyHomeTieAway | ||||
| Thu | 100.0* | Chance in playoffs | 100.0* | Average seed |
| Lippincott | 81.381.681.2 | |||
| Metheny | 50.559.974.6 | 4.74.23.3 | ||
| Smith | 36.236.935.9 | |||
| Salsberry | 35.936.535.5 | |||
| Flores | 33.634.433.4 | |||
| Lassiter vs McNicholsHomeTieAway | ||||
| Thu | 100.0* | Chance in playoffs | 100.0* | Average seed |
| Lippincott | 80.681.682.2 | 2.82.72.7 | ||
| Metheny | 65.767.067.6 | 3.83.73.7 | ||
| Smith | 35.236.837.4 | |||
| Salsberry | 34.936.436.9 | |||
| Flores | 32.734.334.8 | |||
| S Crouch vs M CrouchHomeTieAway | ||||
| Thu | 100.0* | Chance in playoffs | 100.0* | Average seed |
| Lippincott | 81.281.581.3 | |||
| Metheny | 66.366.966.5 | |||
| Smith | 36.036.9*36.1 | |||
| Salsberry | 35.536.635.7 | 5.75.65.6 | ||
| Flores | 33.434.333.6 | |||
* A starred outcome could have no effect or just a really small effect. The simulation did not run long enough to know.
Updated Tuesday, 2023-11-7 2:32 PM Eastern (GMT-05:00)
