Week of 11/2 |
S Crouch 102.9 Barnett 150.1 |
Thu | 100.0* | Chance in playoffs | 100.0* | Average seed |
M Crouch | +4.3 | | +0.1 | |
McNichols | +4.5 | | +0.1 | |
Smith | +1.4 | | | |
Vanzant | +0.8 | | | |
S Crouch | -13.5 | | -0.6 | |
Lippincott | +0.7 | | +0.1 | |
Metheny | +0.8 | | +0.1 | |
Purvis | +1.0 | | +0.1 | |
Barnett | | | +0.1 | |
|
M Crouch 136.3 Lippincott 87 |
Thu | 100.0* | Chance in playoffs | 100.0* | Average seed |
M Crouch | +13.2 | | +0.5 | |
McNichols | -1.1 | | -0.1 | |
Smith | -0.6 | | -0.1 | |
Vanzant | -0.9 | | +0.1 | |
S Crouch | -3.8 | | | |
Lippincott | -4.7 | | -0.6 | |
Metheny | -1.0 | | +0.1 | |
Purvis | -1.0 | | +0.1 | |
|
McNichols 112.8 Metheny 74.9 |
Thu | 100.0* | Chance in playoffs | 100.0* | Average seed |
M Crouch | -0.8 | | -0.1 | |
McNichols | +12.9 | | +0.5 | |
Smith | -0.3 | | -0.1 | |
Vanzant | -0.8 | | +0.1 | |
S Crouch | -4.0 | | | |
Lippincott | -0.7 | | +0.1 | |
Metheny | -5.2 | | -0.6 | |
Purvis | -1.0 | | +0.1 | |
|
Vanzant 126.8 Purvis 54.4 |
Thu | 100.0* | Chance in playoffs | 100.0* | Average seed |
M Crouch | +0.4 | | | |
McNichols | +0.4 | | | |
Smith | -0.2 | | | |
Vanzant | +3.4 | | +0.7 | |
S Crouch | +0.2 | | | |
Lippincott | +0.2 | | | |
Metheny | +0.1 | | | |
Purvis | -4.5 | | -0.8 | |
|
Salsberry 169.8 Smith 102.2 |
Thu | 100.0* | Chance in playoffs | 100.0* | Average seed |
Salsberry | In | | +0.3 | |
M Crouch | +0.5 | | +0.1 | |
McNichols | +0.4 | | +0.1 | |
Smith | -3.3 | | -0.4 | |
Vanzant | +0.4 | | | |
S Crouch | +1.4 | | | |
Lippincott | +0.2 | | | |
Metheny | +0.2 | | | |
Purvis | +0.2 | | | |
|
Week of 11/9 |
Smith vs S CrouchIf winner is:HomeAway | |
Thu | 100.0* | Chance in playoffs | 100.0* | Average seed |
M Crouch | 98.396.3 | | 3.22.9 | |
McNichols | 98.395.6 | | 3.12.9 | |
Smith | 99.888.5 | | 2.73.4 | |
Vanzant | 3.48.1 | | 5.86.1 | |
S Crouch | 0.111.5 | | 6.55.5 | |
Lippincott | | | 7.67.8 | |
Metheny | | | 7.77.9 | |
Purvis | | | 7.87.9 | |
|
Barnett vs VanzantHomeAway | |
Thu | 100.0* | Chance in playoffs | 100.0* | Average seed |
M Crouch | 98.696.0 | | | |
McNichols | 98.395.6 | | | |
Smith | 96.591.8 | | | |
Vanzant | 0.311.3 | | 6.55.4 | |
S Crouch | 6.35.2 | | 5.96.1 | |
Barnett | | | 9.29.8 | |
|
Purvis vs McNicholsHomeAway | |
Thu | 100.0* | Chance in playoffs | 100.0* | Average seed |
M Crouch | 97.597.1 | | 2.93.2 | |
McNichols | 94.199.9 | | 3.32.7 | |
Smith | | | 2.93.2 | |
Vanzant | 7.14.4 | | 6.05.9 | |
S Crouch | 7.14.4 | | 6.15.9 | |
Lippincott | | | 7.97.6 | |
Metheny | | | 8.07.6 | |
Purvis | | | 7.38.4 | |
Barnett | | | 9.69.4 | |
|
Metheny vs M CrouchHomeAway | |
Thu | 100.0* | Chance in playoffs | 100.0* | Average seed |
M Crouch | 94.799.9 | | 3.42.7 | |
McNichols | 97.296.8 | | 2.93.2 | |
Smith | 94.593.8 | | 2.93.2 | |
Vanzant | 6.84.7 | | 6.05.9 | |
S Crouch | 6.84.7 | | 6.15.9 | |
Lippincott | | | 7.97.6 | |
Metheny | | | 7.28.4 | |
Purvis | | | 8.07.7 | |
Barnett | | | 9.69.4 | |
|
Lippincott vs SalsberryHomeAway | |
Thu | 100.0* | Chance in playoffs | 100.0* | Average seed |
Salsberry | | | 1.11.0 | |
Vanzant | | | 6.15.9 | |
S Crouch | | | 6.15.9 | |
Lippincott | | | 7.18.3 | |
Metheny | | | 8.07.6 | |
Purvis | | | 8.07.7 | |
Barnett | | | 9.69.4 | |