Week of 11/2 |
Kyle 45 Josh 53 |
Sun | 100.0* | Chance in playoffs | 100.0* | Average seed |
Jason | +1.2 | | +0.2 | |
Yarroch | +2.3 | | +0.1 | |
Kyle | -15.7 | | -0.8 | |
|
Chris 76 Yarroch 91 |
Sun | 100.0* | Chance in playoffs | 100.0* | Average seed |
Jason | -1.6 | | -0.2 | |
Yarroch | +13.8 | | +0.8 | |
Kyle | -3.3 | | -0.1 | |
|
Jake 42 Jason 55 |
Sun | 100.0* | Chance in playoffs | 100.0* | Average seed |
Jason | +10.0 | | +0.8 | |
Yarroch | +0.2 | | -0.2 | |
Kyle | +0.2 | | -0.2 | |
|
Fitz 59 Zach 62 |
Sun | 100.0* | Chance in playoffs | 100.0* | Average seed |
Jason | +0.2 | | | |
Yarroch | +0.3 | | | |
Kyle | +0.3 | | | |
|
Babs 110 Daryll 33 |
Sun | 100.0* | Chance in playoffs | 100.0* | Average seed |
Jason | -0.1 | | | |
Yarroch | -0.2 | | | |
Kyle | -0.3 | | -0.0 | |
|
Brandon 60 Bill 63 |
Sun | 100.0* | Chance in playoffs | 100.0* | Average seed |
Yarroch | +0.1 | | | |
|
Week of 11/9 |
Jake vs KyleIf winner is:HomeTieAway | |
Sun | 100.0* | Chance in playoffs | 100.0* | Average seed |
Jason | 93.894.292.4 | | 3.13.03.2 | |
Yarroch | 79.176.175.3 | | 4.74.74.8 | |
Kyle | 23.842.565.0 | | 7.26.55.6 | |
|
Josh vs YarrochHomeTieAway | |
Sun | 100.0* | Chance in playoffs | 100.0* | Average seed |
Jason | | | 2.82.93.4 | |
Yarroch | 63.279.491.1 | | 5.64.93.9 | |
Kyle | 45.444.743.4 | | | |
|
Jason vs ChrisHomeTieAway | |
Sun | 100.0* | Chance in playoffs | 100.0* | Average seed |
Jason | 99.196.987.0 | | 2.32.74.0 | |
Yarroch | 77.775.776.7 | | 5.05.04.5 | |
Kyle | 44.541.744.3 | | 6.56.66.3 | |
|
Daryll vs FitzHomeTieAway | |
Sun | 100.0* | Chance in playoffs | 100.0* | Average seed |
Jason | 93.2*93.293.1 | | | |
Yarroch | 77.3*77.377.0 | | | |
Kyle | 44.6*44.444.1 | | | |
|
Babs vs BillHomeTieAway | |
Sun | 100.0* | Chance in playoffs | 100.0* | Average seed |
Yarroch | 77.1*77.377.2 | | | |
Kyle | 44.2*44.344.5 | | | |
* A starred outcome could have no effect or just a really small effect. The simulation did not run long enough to know.