Tuesday |
Buffalo 2 Toronto 1 |
| 100.0* | Chance in playoffs | 100.0* | Win Stanley Cup | 100.0* | Pres Trophy |
Buffalo | In | | +0.1 | | +5.1 | |
Ottawa | | | -0.1 | | -1.1 | |
Detroit | | | | | -0.1 | |
Tampa Bay | +0.5 | | | | | |
Toronto | -0.5 | | | | | |
|
Florida 2 Boston 4 |
| 100.0* | Chance in playoffs | 100.0* | Win Stanley Cup | 100.0* | Pres Trophy |
Detroit | | | +0.1 | | | |
Boston | +0.1 | | | | | |
Florida | -0.1 | | | | | |
|
Los Angeles 2 Detroit 6 |
| 100.0* | Chance in playoffs | 100.0* | Win Stanley Cup | 100.0* | Pres Trophy |
Buffalo | | | | | -0.1 | |
Ottawa | | | -0.0 | | | |
Detroit | | | | | +0.2 | |
Boston | | | +0.0 | | | |
|
Winnipeg 1 Chicago 4 |
| 100.0* | Chance in playoffs | 100.0* | Win Stanley Cup | 100.0* | Pres Trophy |
Buffalo | | | | | +0.2 | |
Ottawa | | | | | +0.1 | |
|
Wednesday |
Anaheim vs DetroitIf winner is:HomeHome OTHome SOAway SOAway OTAway | |
| 100.0* | Chance in playoffs | 100.0* | Win Stanley Cup | 100.0* | Pres Trophy |
Buffalo | | | | | 35.735.6*35.635.435.435.4 | |
Ottawa | | | 15.1*15.0*15.1*15.015.014.9 | | 11.9*11.8*11.8*11.7*11.711.7 | |
Detroit | | | | | 0.20.40.40.91.01.0 | |
Boston | | | 4.1*4.2*4.24.24.24.2 | | | |
|
Ottawa vs DallasHomeHome OTHome SOAway SOAway OTAway | |
| 100.0* | Chance in playoffs | 100.0* | Win Stanley Cup | 100.0* | Pres Trophy |
Buffalo | | | 8.7*8.7*8.7*8.8*8.78.8 | | 34.634.734.736.836.938.5 | |
Ottawa | InInIn*In*In100.0 | | 15.115.115.114.914.914.8 | | 13.813.813.78.88.85.2 | |
Detroit | | | | | 0.50.50.60.70.70.7 | |
Tampa Bay | | | *4.9*5.0*4.95.0*4.95.0 | | | |
* A starred outcome could have no effect or just a really small effect. The simulation did not run long enough to know.